The Mirage of Time Throughout Modern Physics: Scandalous Life of an Impostor

29 April 2022, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

E. Schrodinger’s Quantum Mechanics taught us since early 20th Century a traumatizing lesson: bound electrons, atoms and molecules want nothing to do with the physical variable of time. In the same period, A. Einstein equally deflated the variable in his Relativistic analysis of astrophysics by showing its dependency on motion, mass and gravitation. His physics dilated time in order to keep it a workable concept in cosmology. These destabilizing visions of time always faced the obstacle of practical appeal and self-evidence the notion instills in everyone’s conscious experience. It thus never died in physics despite physicists’ increasing awareness of its problematic aura. Many today concede that time is not “fundamental”, yet the visualization of a macroscopic world bereft of time-driven phenomenology has not been successfully formulated if severally attempted. In this thesis, I show that the notion is vacuous by broadly reviewing it in Newtonian Physics, Relativity and Quantum Gravity.

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.
Comment number 2, Arnab Sinha: Mar 29, 2023, 07:06

The claim is correct (I have not gone into the mathematics of it). But as far as my common sense goes, Nature does not need time as it is perpetual - it never reaches equilibrium. Since there is no end of it - the question of time does not arise. Time has been created by humans as our time is limited. Nature does not need a clock. Best, Arnab

Comment number 1, Dharam Ahluwalia: Dec 28, 2022, 04:51

Stationary states in quantum mechanics have no observable time dependence, but once one makes a linear superposition of them, the time evolution becomes manifest. It appears your thesis misses this.

Response,
Joseph Jean-Claude :
Feb 16, 2023, 13:00

Find me a metric of time substantiated by a natural unit of time, then we can start talking about time as a true physical variable that can be perceived thru a linear prism in any dynamic system. You are making a pre-conceived human projection over natural states of matter that can be better studied otherwise thru phase correlations generally. The quantum material wavefunction is NOT A FUNCTION OF TIME, if anyone can theoretically derive them in their known numeric quantities thru the figures of De Broglie wavelengths and Compton wavelengths, as I have done in the Quanto-Geometric framework (QG, Vol II). Best.