The Emergent Synthetic Brain Concept of Law as Action Type

08 January 2021, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

This paper reviews and restates the thesis in Law as Art (Bagnall, 1996), in light of current scholarship. Law as real physical and symbolic social phenomena. Compound cluster properties, combining to form distinct social networks, a ‘nesting’, explicable within contemporary post-Quantum theory. They are conceived within an emergent synthetic brain concept, a neurological mind mapping of coherent, sentient factual data from experience of legal phenomena. Mind mapping identifies the works unique indexing criteria, enabling enactment of the heuristically distinct structure. As action type, it is a dynamic, variable dramatic enactment in which text and power are dominant indexing criteria. Text is to law what a script is to a play. Law enacts heuristically distinct structures capable of an infinite set of equal, inchoate enactments. By Quantum analogy, it structurally integrates through audience, observer engagement. Multiple works may share common provenance and style, neurologically integrating and organising as a legal system.

Keywords

Concept of Law
Synthetic Brain Concept
Law as Action Type
Scientific Realism
Legal Theory
Cluster Property
Structure and Heuristic
Quantum Theory

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.