Duration as a focus-marking device in Cantonese

06 November 2020, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

Pitch register is found to be the major prosodic device for marking focus in tone languages like Mandarin, with on-focal boosting and post-focal compression. However, both are limited or even missing in Cantonese, leading to the claim that Cantonese does not rely on prosodic cues to mark focus and prefers morphosyntactic means. The current study reveals how duration, another prosodic parameter, is systematically manipulated under focus, and interacts with lexical tones and syntactic markers. The results show that: (1) both on-focal lengthening and post-focal duration compression are present; (2) the presence of syntactic markers further increases the on-focal lengthening due to its strong pragmatic meaning, yet cancels out the post-focal compression; (3) checked tones resist lengthening, but the duration of preceding syllable increases as a compensation. We concluded that Cantonese uses different prosodic marking device compared to Mandarin, which is related to their differences in word prosody.

Keywords

Prosodic focus
Post-focal compression
Cantonese

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.