A study on the relationship of poverty with untouchability practices

14 April 2020, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

Poverty is a complex and much contested social phenomenon. Different authors have defined poverty from various perspectives. The definition of poverty by the author determines how that particular mechanism developed by them tried to combat the phenomena or what the ethical conception of social justice is based upon. Townsend relied on absolute and relative perspective whereas Rawls envisage about the just society with difference principle. Sen focuses on the lack of ability to make choice as poor to develop capability approach. To this, Sangroula opines lack of access to commodities and development, and social exclusion as three deprivations thereby leading to poverty. This article bases its empirical research of the villages of Kavre and Ramechhap district on the above 3 deprivation to analyze the multidimensional approaches to poverty. This study aims to figure out whether poverty as a cause of untouchability practices through stratified random sampling of 34 individuals

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.