Identifying Sources of NOx emissions from Aircraft through Source Apportionment and Regression Models

17 May 2024, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Air quality managers in areas exceeding air pollution standards are motivated to understand where there are further opportunities to reduce NOx emissions to improve ozone and PM2.5 air quality. In this project, we use a combination of aircraft remote sensing (i.e., GCAS), source apportionment models (i.e., CAMx), and regression models to investigate NOx emissions from individual source-sectors in Houston, TX. In prior work, GCAS column NO2 was shown to be close to the “truth” in validating column NO2 in model simulations. Column NO2 from CAMx was substantially low biased compared to Pandora (–20%) and GCAS measurements (–31%), suggesting an underestimate of local NOx emissions. We applied a flux divergence method to the GCAS and CAMx data to distinguish the linear shape of major highways and identify NO2 underestimates at highway locations. Using a multiple linear regression model, we isolated on-road, railyard, and “other” NOx emissions as the likeliest cause of this low bias, and simultaneously identified a potential overestimate of shipping NOx emissions. We modified on-road and shipping NOX emissions in a new CAMx simulation and increased the background NO2, and better agreement was found with GCAS measurements: bias improved from –31% to –10% and r2 improved from 0.78 to 0.80. This study outlines how remote sensing data, including fine spatial information from newer instruments such as TEMPO, can be used in concert with chemical transport models to provide actionable information for air quality managers to identify further opportunities to reduce NOx emissions.

Keywords

NO2
NOx emissions
Remote sensing
Source apportionment

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supporting Information
Description
Contents of the file: Figure S1. GCAS NO2 measurements separated by time-of-day Figure S2. WRF-CAMx 36/12/4/1.333/0.444 km modeling domains. Table S1. WRF v4.3.3 physics options and data sources used in this study Table S2. Vertical layer mapping from 44 WRF layers to 30 CAMx layers Table S3. Science options used for the CAMx model Table S4. CAMx Source Apportionment configuration Table S5. Average September 2021 NOx and VOC weekday emissions Figure S3. Pie Chart of September 2021 NOx and VOC weekday emissions Figure S4. Spatial distribution of on-road mobile shipping daily NOx emissions Figure S5. Aggregated satellite-derived NOX emissions for the Houston, TX area Figure S6. CAMx and MLR Source Apportionment: default and MLR adjusted Figure S7. Sector contribution to NO2 Vertical Columns for the MLR
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.