Substituting steel for a polymer in a jar for ball milling does matter

24 December 2021, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Usually, in situ diffraction studies of mechanochemical transformations use plastic milling jars in place of steel. This is done to reduce the absorbtion of radiation by the walls. Using as an example the polymorphic transformation of β-glycine, we show that the transformation rate can vary significantly depending on the material of the jars. Using ex situ analysis we here compare the transformation rates in steel and common plastics such as acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, polylactic acid, and polyethylene terephthalate glycol.

Keywords

mechanochemistry
in situ studies
polymorphic transitions
tribochemistry
glycine
rheology

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.